UNISON TEK CO., LTD.

廠商

名稱

(Supplier Name)

評鑑

地點

(Location)

陪同

者

(Surveyor)

分類(Item)

評 鑑 項 目(Audit Question)

配比(Point)

得分(Score)

總 得 分(Total Score)

一

般

管

理

制

度

(General Management System)

1. 是否有公司明訂之組織與權責？

(Is the department and its responsiblities clearly defined?)

5

2. 是否有計劃或不定期舉辦訓練？(Is there a training in place on a routine basis?)

5

建議事項(Suggestions)

3. 公司整理狀況是否良好？(Is the environment of the factory in a good condition?)

5

4. 對客戶提供之圖面或文件是否專人管理？(Are the drawings, documents or data received from customers handled with care? )

5

5. 倉儲區之規劃是否安全、清晰有足夠空間？(Is the condition of the warehouse well-maintained, with clear indentification of each item and suffcient space for storing the goods?)

5

備註(Notes)

品

質

管

理

制

度

(Quality Control System)

1. 品管人員是否具專業訓練或工作經歷？(Is the quality control staff well-trained, with similar work experiences?)

5

1. 評分以65分為及格。

(The total score is equal to or above 65.)

2. 評比中各單項分數有一項不滿2分時，應於說明。

(When the score for any one of the question is below 2, please clarify)

3. 評比單項得分零分者不予列入合格廠商。

(When the score for any one of the question is zero, the supplier should be marked "unqualified")

2. 是否執行應有之各項檢驗作業？(Are all the quality assurance works executed properly and with caution?)

6

3. 各項檢驗是否有書面規定？記錄是否完整？(Are all the quality assurance works kept in written documents? Are the documents written in detail? )

5

4. 量規儀器是否追溯國家標準予以校正？(Whether the guage equipments are traceable to national or International calibration standard)

8

5. 是否統計各項檢驗之數據並加以分析改善？(Is every collected data being analyed and improved-upon?)

5

6. 產品之合格識別是否足夠、清晰？(Is the product's qualified identification sufficient and clear)

5

7. 對不合格品之處置與檢討是否明訂？(Are the solutions and preventative meansures against unqualified products well- organized?)

6

8. 是否有客戶抱怨處理管道並明訂負責單位？(Is there a customer complaint team in place?)

8

9. 各項工作之作業標準是否有書面化文件？(Are all the standard operating procedures installed and with written record)

7

技

術

能

力

1. 生產設備精度、能力是否足夠？(Is the accuracy and capability of the production equipment sufficient?)

2. 是否有研究開發／設計之能力與制度？(Does the vendor has Research and Deveopment team in place?)

3. 對異常之改善是否確實並加以標準化？(Is the improvement for quality /technical issues standarized?)

4. 機台設備及模治具之管理、維護是否足夠？(Is the management/repairment of equipment and tooling under control?)

裁

示

(Results)

□予以列入合格廠商(Qualified Vendor)

評鑑人員

(Evaluator)

品保部

(Quality Control Sector)

總經理

(General Manager)

□不予列入合格廠商

(Unqualifed Vendor)